💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

CharlesZ (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
I live in a POA in central Florida. At our recent Annual Members' Meeting I submitted, and the Board accepted, a petition signed by 65 homeowners (57% of the association's membership) requesting a Special Members' Meeting for the purpose of discussing and developing a plan to address the horrific condition of the lawns throughout our community. The legislated 5 days for the board to certify signatures ended with the close of business today. In regard to the Special Member's Meeting, I have some specific questions.

1. Since it is a Special Members' Meeting rather than a Special Board Meeting is the date, time and location still dictated by the board or do the petitioners get to select the date, time and location?

2. If the board selects the date, time and location is there a time limit imposed as to how long they have upon receipt of the petition before the meeting must occur? Our bylaws are silent on the timing and Florida Statute 720 is not particularly clear as to the when.

3. Since it is critical to have a sufficient number of homeowners who signed the petition present at the meeting to establish a quorum (believe it is 20%), do the petitioners have any influence as to the "when" to ensure they can get maximum participation? Looks like 60 days for a Special "Board" Meeting but unclear or confusing in regard to Special "Member" Meetings.

4. Prior to our recent Annual Meeting, the CAM sent out an agenda along with a proxy form to every homeowner to appoint either the president or someone of their choosing to vote for board candidates in their absence, if they could not attend. Is it therefore possible to create a similar proxy form for any of the 65 homeowners who signed the petition and are unable to attend, yet want their vote to count by having someone vote as their proxy?

5. In reading Florida Statute, only those homeowners who signed the petition are eligible to vote at the Special Members' Meeting. Now, if the proxy form discussed in 4 above is valid and authorized, can a homeowner who signed the petition select any association member to vote in their place, if unable to attend, or must their proxy also be a signatory of the petition?

I think that about covers all of my questions. If those of you out have experience with the proceedings at a Special Members' Meeting, I also welcome any additional information you can offer. Thanks in advance.

Regards,

Chuck Z
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 1,289
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CharlesZ on 03/26/2026 6:29 PM
I live in a POA in central Florida. At our recent Annual Members' Meeting I submitted, and the Board accepted, a petition signed by 65 homeowners (57% of the association's membership) requesting a Special Members' Meeting for the purpose of discussing and developing a plan to address the horrific condition of the lawns throughout our community. The legislated 5 days for the board to certify signatures ended with the close of business today.
I have searched FS 720 and I cannot find this 5 day requirement. Can you cite the FS 720 section that speaks to this 5-day requirement?
Quote:
Posted By CharlesZ on 03/26/2026 6:29 PM
In regard to the Special Member's Meeting, I have some specific questions.

1. Since it is a Special Members' Meeting rather than a Special Board Meeting is the date, time and location still dictated by the board or do the petitioners get to select the date, time and location?
You have to read both FS 720 and FS 617.

Under FS 720, the petitioners do not have a say as to when the meeting will occur.

Under FS 617, the petitioners to have some say on the "when," depending on certain things. More on this below.

Quote:
Posted By CharlesZ on 03/26/2026 6:29 PM
2. If the board selects the date, time and location is there a time limit imposed as to how long they have upon receipt of the petition before the meeting must occur? Our bylaws are silent on the timing and Florida Statute 720 is not particularly clear as to the when.
So far it appears to me that FS 720 is silent on this point.

FS 617 says 30 days. More on this below.

In general where a board has discretion, the courts say the board has to be "reasonable and fair." Granted this likely will not help much where a board is hostile to an owner's ideas and presenting these ideas at a special meeting of the members.

Quote:
Posted By CharlesZ on 03/26/2026 6:29 PM
3. Since it is critical to have a sufficient number of homeowners who signed the petition present at the meeting to establish a quorum (believe it is 20%), do the petitioners have any influence as to the "when" to ensure they can get maximum participation?
See FS 720.306 (1) (a). If your bylaws are silent on quorum for owners' meetings, then the number is 30%.

More on the "when" below, pursuant to FS 617.

Quote:
Posted By CharlesZ on 03/26/2026 6:29 PM
4. Prior to our recent Annual Meeting, the CAM sent out an agenda along with a proxy form to every homeowner to appoint either the president or someone of their choosing to vote for board candidates in their absence, if they could not attend. Is it therefore possible to create a similar proxy form for any of the 65 homeowners who signed the petition and are unable to attend, yet want their vote to count by having someone vote as their proxy?
Here is the deal with votes at owners' meeting:

The item to be voted on must be properly noticed to all owners. In other words, an owner cannot spontaneously make a motion at a special meeting of the owners (members) on any substantive topic and have a lawful vote of the owners.

You need to plan for this owners meeting to be more like a town hall meeting. Folks can speak their minds. Under the law this is pretty much all that can happen.

Quote:
Posted By CharlesZ on 03/26/2026 6:29 PM
5. In reading Florida Statute, only those homeowners who signed the petition are eligible to vote at the Special Members' Meeting.
This is false. All owners must be invited and property noticed for this special meeting of the owners. All owners have the right to vote. It does not matter whether an owner signed the petition or not.

For items placed on the agenda for a vote, and where the law allows such a vote, proxies are allowed.

Be advised that the owners rights to have a lawful vote are limited. In particular, owners have the right to vote --

-- for directors;

-- to recall directors;

-- on amendments to the Declaration and usually, the bylaws too

-- on any other topic where a owners' vote is expressly allowed by the bylaws, declaration or statute.

In general the owners cannot lawfully vote to override a board decision. Instead, if owners do not like a board decision, their recourse is to vote to recall the directors who are not doing what the owners want. Caveat: It is far easier to vote directors off the board at the regular, annual meeting. And yes, I am aware that the board and CAM do not seem to be complying with the law and/or bylaws when it comes to elections. But the recourse for enforcing the bylaws is through specific dispute resolution procedures or the court. FS 720 speaks to how owners can force the board to comply with the bylaws.

The Florida nonprofit corporation statute FS 617 has more on special meetings of owners (members). If the board will not call a meeting of the owners (members), then FS 617.0701 (3) (f) gives you the right to call the meeting yourself.

I think petitioning for a special board meeting probably would have been better. At a board meeting (called for by owners), owners have certain exact rights to speak. For the details, see FS 720.303 (2) (d).

Be advised that you are trying to digest a lot of legalese in a short amount of time. Read every statute sections I cited above. Keep asking questions. Be aware that boards are armed with an attorney (paid for by the owners' assessments). You are not. The Board will wield the attorney like a cudgel to shut you down. That may sound awful and even evil. But given the fact that owners can always vote directors off the board, it is not that awful nor that evil. On the third hand, apathy is often the enemy. Recalling a director tends to be difficult, legally, since a recall means getting the board's cooperation for a special meeting of the owners, and a hostile board can get away with dragging its feet. Or owners fail to dot all the i's and cross all the t's in their petition for a special meeting or recall, and the board can simply refuse to have the special meeting or recall vote.

Annual elections give owners the best chance of getting rid of directors the owners do not like.
JackieB4 (California)
Posts: 398
Posted:
As usual,(and THANK YOU) Ellen donates her time to simplify the legal terminology most of us don't understand. The three A's we need to digest are: Annual, Attorney, & Apathy.
They each have a strong grip on the harmony of our communities. Ellen deserves an A+ for responding.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 1,289
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JackieB4 on 03/27/2026 8:31 AM
The three A's we need to digest are: Annual, Attorney, & Apathy.
They each have a strong grip on the harmony of our communities.
Does the annual" refer to "annual meeting" (elections and so on)?

Either way, good one.

Thank you for the kind words.
CharlesZ (Florida)
Posts: 12
Posted:
ElleN,

I echo JackieB4's sentiment! You have done a superb job in answering all of my questions. Ignorance is no excuse, but the more I read and the more questions I ask, the more I continue to learn. I am very much a layman and as such it becomes readily apparent to me that the entire HOA/POA process is stacked against the homeowner. For starters, we act as individuals and are truly the silent minority. We have no legal representation (as does the board on the membership's dime) and try to wade through all the legislation while making interpretations that, at times, turn out to be incorrect. It was much easier for me to understand Army policy throughout 26 years of service.

Now to touch on a few of your questions. As hard as I look, I cannot reference the paragraph in FS 720 that provides the board 5 days to certify the signatures on the petition. I can only think that I read that on-line during a google search of how to present a petition for a special meeting. Regardless of where I read it, I should have known better than to trust anything unless I could reference it within FS 720. Shame on me!

I guess at times my tenacity gets the best of me as I am driven to do the right thing. I will always run into the fight and consider myself a problem solver who always works to improve the situation or solve the problem. Turns out this HOA stuff is just hard business and not as easy for the common man to understand. Life in HOA land is tough, and I see why so many homeowners are frustrated because it seems they have little recourse in dealing with an issue short of a board member's recall.

The reason I petitioned for a special members' meeting rather than a special board meeting is because FS 720.306 states that at a special "board" meeting the board need only address the petition item at the meeting and is not obligated to take any other action requested by the petition. (I did not want the board to summarily dismiss the petition). While a special members' meeting does not permit voting, the homeowners will at least have the opportunity to address the problem and have a discussion. My thought process is that a frank and open discussion would case the board to consider the homeowners' concerns in attacking the problem. In life, it is easy to dismiss someone over a text or an email but much harder to 'man up' and do so in person. At this point, if that is all we accomplish than we achieved some success. If the board chooses not to take appropriate action, then we as homeowners can always choose the recall option.

In starting up my friend's group via email I was only attempting to update about 30 folks (after securing their permission) on where things stood and float some ideas in planning for the eventual meeting to generate discussion

My intent was to energize those homeowners and get them up off their couches. It was easy to get 65 signatures on a petition but a heck of a lot harder to get homeowners involved to take action. And there lies the crux of the problem in making HOAs work. The communities that do that well and work together certainly prosper as evidenced by one of our neighboring POAs. Those like mine, who struggle to get involved and work together, are destined to struggle and face repeated frustration.

Thanks again for all your sage wisdom. You certainly have created a fan in me!

Chuck Z
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 1,289
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By CharlesZ on 03/27/2026 5:31 PM

Now to touch on a few of your questions. As hard as I look, I cannot reference the paragraph in FS 720 that provides the board 5 days to certify the signatures on the petition. I can only think that I read that on-line during a google search of how to present a petition for a special meeting.
I feel like I read this somewhere too. But nor can I put my finger on it.
Quote:
Posted By CharlesZ on 03/27/2026 5:31 PM
I guess at times my tenacity gets the best of me as I am driven to do the right thing. I will always run into the fight and consider myself a problem solver who always works to improve the situation or solve the problem. Turns out this HOA stuff is just hard business and not as easy for the common man to understand. Life in HOA land is tough, and I see why so many homeowners are frustrated because it seems they have little recourse in dealing with an issue short of a board member's recall.
I wonder if these folks not being trained in military discipline is part of the problem.
Quote:
Posted By CharlesZ on 03/27/2026 5:31 PM
While a special members' meeting does not permit voting, the homeowners will at least have the opportunity to address the problem and have a discussion.
Yeahbut FS 720 requires that each owner "shall have the right to speak for at least 3 minutes on each matter placed on the agenda by petition, provided that the member signs the sign-up sheet, if one is provided, or submits a written request to speak prior to the meeting." (I think you saw this.)

You're doing great, Sir. In another life I want to come back as an Army officer (instead of my Navy experience). Seriously.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 1,289
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By ElleN on 03/27/2026 6:45 PM

You're doing great, Sir. In another life I want to come back as an Army officer
Or better, work my way up to being one of those Master Sergeants on whom all the officers rely.

Pipe dreams
MinuteM1 (Florida)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Chuck, Ellen's guidance is spot-on. Let me add some statute clarity on the quorum and member rights pieces.

**On Quorum (Question 3):** Florida Statute § 720.306(1)(a) states that unless your Declaration specifies otherwise, a quorum for owner meetings is 30% of voting interests—not 20%. This is critical. If you miscalculate, the meeting could be declared invalid. Since your bylaws are silent, the default 30% applies. If 57% of owners signed the petition, you should easily have a quorum if reasonable notice is given.

**On Member Rights to Speak (supporting your town-hall approach):** § 720.303(2)(d) gives each owner "the right to speak for at least 3 minutes on each matter placed on the agenda by petition." This is a statutory right. Your board cannot legally restrict owner speech at a properly-noticed special meeting when the agenda item came from a petition. Document this in your meeting notice and agenda—it protects owners' ability to be heard.

**On Proxies (Question 4-5):** Ellen is correct that voting at a special members' meeting is generally limited to matters where voting is expressly authorized (director elections, Charter/Bylaw amendments, recall). For **non-voting discussion items**, proxies aren't needed. But if your petition triggers any votable matters, proxies are allowed under § 720.303(2)(c), and a proxy can be held by any owner—not just petition signatories. That said, verify your Declaration on proxy rules; some associations have restrictions.

**Practical Note:** Make sure your notice to the board states the **exact** purpose and matters for the special meeting, complying with § 720.306(2). The board has reasonable time to schedule (the "30 days" Ellen mentioned comes from § 617, the nonprofit statute). Send notice by certified mail and keep proof—you'll need documentation that proper notice was given.

Ellen's point about annual elections is worth emphasizing: if the board ignores the membership after this meeting, director recall or voting out board members at next year's annual meeting is your ultimate recourse.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 1,289
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MinuteM1 on 04/24/2026, 4:17 AM

if your petition triggers any votable matters, proxies are allowed under § 720.303(2)(c), and a proxy can be held by any owner—not just petition signatories.

Once again, your citation is wrong. Section 720.303 (2) (c) pertains only to board meetings (not meetings of the owners).

Stay away from AI.
ElleN (Idaho)
Posts: 1,289
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By MinuteM1 on 04/24/2026, 4:17 AM

**Practical Note:** Make sure your notice to the board states the **exact** purpose and matters for the special meeting, complying with § 720.306(2).

Florida statute § 720.306(2) says nothing of the sort.

You ought to change your HOATalk handle to "AI-Not-So-Smarty-Pants."

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here